Legal Opinion

In re Hurtley

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 20, 2018No. A162096PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAoyagi, J.

*511Wife obtained a dissolution judgment against husband by default in 2009. The dissolution judgment includes a provision that, according to wife, required husband to pay her $200,000 upon his taking title to certain real property. In 2015, after husband had *473taken title to the property, wife filed a motion requesting entry of a supplemental judgment with a $200,000 money award. Husband opposed the motion. Following a hearing, the trial court entered a supplemental judgment in which it ruled, as a matter of law, that wife was not entitled to a money award under the dissolution judgment. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. English v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Denkers v. Durham Leasing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. In re the Marriage of NealCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. Simpkins v. ConnorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. In re the Marriage of GramCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Daniel-Elliott and DanielCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  2. Rinegard-Guirma v. PHH Mortgage CorporationUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API