Legal Opinion
Davis v. Hosaka Nagel & Co. CA4/1
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 20, 2021No. D076593Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
Filed 4/20/21 Davis v. Hosaka Nagel & Co. CA4/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA JAIMIE DAVIS, D076593 Plaintiff and Appellant, v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2014- 00024074-CU-RI-CTL) HOSAKA NAGEL & CO., et al., Defendants…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- ComputerXpress, Inc. v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Benach v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Jiminez v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Supreme Court · 1971
- Harrison v. Sutter Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Winograd v. American Broadcasting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.