Legal Opinion
Chacko v. Texas a & M University
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided April 4, 1997No. Civil Action H-95-4637PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CRONE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the court is Defendants Texas A&M University (“TAMU”), E. Dean Gage (“Gage”), Benton Cocanougher (“Coca-nougher”), Emily Ashworth (“Ashworth”), and Suzanne Droleskey’s (“Droleskey”) Motion for Summary Judgment (#28). These defendants seek summary judgment on Plaintiff Jane Chacko’s (“Chacko”) claims alleging discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”). Defendant Violetta Burke Cook (“Cook”) has not moved for summary…
2Cases cited160 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
155 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Anderson v. ConboyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Harville v. Texas A & M UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
- United States v. Richard Dattner ArchitectsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Chellen v. John Pickle Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2006
- Middlebrooks v. University of Maryland at College ParkDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.