Legal Opinion
Bulova Watch Company v. Rogers-Kent, Incorporated
District Court, E.D. South Carolina
Decided February 26, 1960No. Civ. A. No. 4627PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TIMMERMAN, Chief Judge.
I have for consideration objections to the Special Master’s Report in this case, which was brought to restrain what the plaintiff contended were violations by the defendant of the Fair Trade Statute of South Carolina (Sections 66-91 through 66-95 of the South Carolina Code of Laws 1952). There was and is no federal question involved. As may be seen, by reference to the record herein, the Court, on plaintiff’s motion, granted a preliminary injunction enjoining the defendant from selling Bulova products for less than the Fair Trade prices upon the plaintiff filing a bond…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Merck & Co. Inc. v. LyonDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1996
- Alabama ex rel. Siegelman v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Network International L.C. v. Worldcom Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- State of Alabama v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Company v. S.E.K. Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.