Legal Opinion

Tanghe v. Tanghe

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 2005No. S-11222PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

The main issue in this case is whether the marital and separate property components of a 401(k) plan should be determined by using a coverture fraction or by tracing the earnings of the separate property component. We conclude that the latter method should be used because it is accurate and the former is not. A second issue is whether survivor benefits payable under a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) must be capitalized based on the longer life expectancy of the non-employee spouse. We conclude that they need not be capitalized because doing so places an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cox v. CoxAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Laing v. LaingAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Bettinger v. BettingerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Nicholson v. WolfeAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Zito v. ZitoAlaska Supreme Court · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ethelbah v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Mellard v. MellardAlaska Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API