Tanghe v. Tanghe
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
The main issue in this case is whether the marital and separate property components of a 401(k) plan should be determined by using a coverture fraction or by tracing the earnings of the separate property component. We conclude that the latter method should be used because it is accurate and the former is not. A second issue is whether survivor benefits payable under a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) must be capitalized based on the longer life expectancy of the non-employee spouse. We conclude that they need not be capitalized because doing so places an…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cox v. CoxAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
- Laing v. LaingAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Bettinger v. BettingerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
- Nicholson v. WolfeAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Zito v. ZitoAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ethelbah v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Mellard v. MellardAlaska Supreme Court · 2007