Mellard v. Mellard
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Chief Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Milton Mellard appeals the property division in his divorce. He argues that the trial court erred when it failed to value Cathleen Mellard's retirement account. Milton also challenges the trial court's failure to provide for Milton's future medical expenses in the property division and its award of $1,500 in attorney's fees to Cathleen. Because the trial court failed to place any value on Cathleen's retirement account, we remand the case so that the account can be valued and the property division reevaluated. The trial court's decisions regarding…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cox v. CoxAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
- Kowalski v. KowalskiAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Laing v. LaingAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Root v. RootAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Tanghe v. TangheAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ethelbah v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Parks v. ParksAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Tillmon v. TillmonAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Mengisteab v. OatesAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Partridge v. PartridgeAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.