Legal Opinion
Autoalliance International, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided November 10, 2004No. Slip Op. 04-138; Court 01-01070PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion AND Order
CARMAN, Judge.
Pursuant to United States Court of International Trade (“USCIT”) Rule 55(c), the defendant, the United States, moved to set aside entry of default. Defendant argued inadvertence in its failure to file a timely answer to Plaintiffs Amended Complaint. Defendant had separately moved for leave to file out of time a motion for stay or extension of time and motion for extension of time prior to the entry - of default. Plaintiff opposed Defendant’s motion asserting that Defendant failed to demonstrate excusable neglect required to set aside the entry of default. This…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Toney Gomes, Jr. v. Ellen L. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Mason v. ListerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Eli L. Medunic and Dolores M. Medunic v. Louis W. LedererCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- O'connor v. State Of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Gadsden v. Jones Lang Lasalle Americas, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Autoalliance International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
- Kahrs International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Kahrs Int'l, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009