Legal Opinion

City of St. Louis v. Senter Commission Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 5, 1935PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a proceeding under the charter of the city of St. Louis in.which appellants’ property was assessed for benefits from the widening of Market Street. Appellants were not defendants in the condemnation suit as none of their property was taken or damaged. Jurisdiction for the assessment of the benefits taxed against their properties depends upon the sufficiency of the notice giving the boundaries of the proposed benefit or taxing district published by the commissioners and appointed by the circuit court to determine the damages in the condemnation suit and to assess benefits to property…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Security Trust & Safety Vault Co. v. City of LexingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. St. Louis, Keokuk & Northwestern Railway Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  3. City of St. Louis v. RossiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  4. Kansas City v. LiebiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  5. County Court v. GriswoldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re Armory Site in Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  2. Missouri Public Service Company v. ArgenbrightSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  3. Union Electric Company v. LevinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. State Ex Rel. Southern Real Estate & Financial Co. v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1938
  5. State Ex Rel. Coffman v. CrainMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API