In re Hoffman
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 97 Ohio St.3d 92.] IN RE HOFFMAN. [Cite as In re Hoffman,
2002-Ohio-5368.] Juvenile law—Permanent custody proceeding—Parties to the proceeding have the right to cross-examine the guardian ad litem concerning the contents of the report and the basis for the custody recommendation when the report will be a factor in the trial court’s decision. (No. 2002-0246—Submitted June 26, 2002—Decided October 23, 2002.) CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Stark County, No. 2001CA00207,
2001-Ohio-1816. __________________ SYLLABUS OF THE COURT In…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- In re HayesOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Stanford v. StanfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- In re HoffmanOhio Supreme Court · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- In re WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Kelley v. KelleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- In re J.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
- In Re WalkerOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
- In re J.F., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.