Legal Opinion
Wentling v. Popular Science Publishing Company
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 11, 1959No. Civ. A. 6300PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLLMER, District Judge.
This is a private anti-trust action for treble damages under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1 and 2) and Section 12 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C.A. §22).
It appears from the complaint that the plaintiff, S. A. Wentling, is a partnership composed of Stanley A. Wentling and F. Robert Kreider, with its principal place of business at Palmyra, Lebanon County, in the Middle Judicial District of Pennsylvania; that the defendants herein involved are(a) Popular Science Publishing Company, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “Popular Science”), a New York…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Angel v. BullingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Scophony Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Echeverry v. Kellogg Switchboard & Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Jeffrey-Nichols Motor Co. v. Hupp Motor Car CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Myers v. American Dental Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Bjorgung v. Whitetail Resort, LPCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Bartholomew v. Virginia Chiropractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- Newport Components, Inc. v. NEC Home Electronics (U.S.A.), Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1987
- Denny v. CareyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.