Legal Opinion

People v. Lumley

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 9, 1986No. Docket 88217PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant was charged with first-degree criminal sexual conduct. Following a Walker [People v Walker (On Rehearing), 374 Mich 331; 132 NW2d 87 (1965)] hearing in the St. Clair Circuit Court, the court granted defendant’s motion to suppress written inculpatory statements he made following a polygraph examination, in which he admitted to having penetrated the five-year-old victim’s vagina with his finger. The statement was suppressed on the basis of involuntari ness. The people appeal by leave granted. We reverse.

On appeal from a Walker hearing, we are required to examine the entire record and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Wyrick v. FieldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. People v. CateyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. People v. HangslebenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. RayMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v SorianoMichigan Supreme Court · 2026
  3. People v. RayMichigan Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API