People v. Ray
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBoyle, J.
INTRODUCTION
This Court granted leave to appeal in the instant case to resolve two questions. We are asked to determine first, whether statements made by a defendant during the course of a polygraph examination should be admissible at trial as a matter of state or federal constitutional law or public policy. Secondly, we must determine whether the Court of *263Appeals erred in this case in imposing a duty on the trial court to hold a Walker1 hearing sua sponte in the presence of alerting circumstances.
We hold that neither state or federal law nor public policy requires the automatic suppression at…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Fleming v. MetrishCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- People v. McElhaneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- People v. PhillipsMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. DeWeeseWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re CareyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.