Legal Opinion

Hewitt v. L.E. Myers Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 2012No. 2011-2013PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*200Lundberg Stratton, J.

{¶ 1} We are asked to decide whether “equipment safety guard” for purposes of R.C. 2745.01(C) includes only those devices on a machine that shield an employee from injury by guarding the point of operation of that machine and whether the “deliberate removal” of such an “equipment safety guard” occurs when an employer makes a deliberate decision to lift, push aside, take off, or otherwise eliminate that guard from the machine.

{¶2} For the reasons that follow, we hold that as used in R.C. 2745.01(C), “equipment safety guard” means a device designed to shield the operator…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. HairstonOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Kaminski v. Metal & Wire Products Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Stetter v. R.J. Corman Derailment Services, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Akron Centre Plaza Ltd. Liability Co. v. Summit County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Hoyle v. DTJ Enterprises, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Bliss v. Johns ManvilleOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  3. M6 Motors, Inc. v. Nissan of N. Olmsted, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Williams v. ALPLA, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Pixley v. Pro-Pak Industries, Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API