Legal Opinion
Lamoureux v. AnazaoHealth Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided April 21, 2008No. 3:03cv01382(WIG)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE [DOC. # 196]
WILLIAM I. GARFINKEL, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to Rule 12(f), Fed.R.Civ.P., defendant AnazaoHealth Corporation has moved to strike the amended reply [Doc. # 195] of Richard A Terwilliger and IdeaM-atrix, Inc. (collectively “the Terwilliger plaintiffs”) 1 to defendant’s amended counterclaim [Doc. # 192], Defendant argues that plaintiffs were required to seek leave of court before filing this amended pleading, which made substantive changes to their previous reply and added twelve new affirmative defenses. The Terwilliger…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- First City National Bank & Trust Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1990
- Sapiro v. Encompass InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2004
- Bell v. Executive Committee of the United Food & Commercial Workers Pension Plan for EmployeesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. RaffaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Walters v. Performant Recovery, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
- Kuria v. PALISADES ACQUISITION XVI, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2010
- 405 Sullivan Avenue Industrial LLC v. Kuhns Family Properties, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
- Alfonso v. FedEx Ground Package System IncDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- Douglas v. Albany Police DepartmentDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2024
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.