Legal Opinion

In re Adoption of Asente

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 2000No. 99-2158PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated by the court of appeals in its opinion rendered on November 1,1999, which we adopt and attach as an appendix to this entry.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

APPENDIX

William M. O’Neill, Judge.

The following appeal concerns an interstate custody dispute. It represents a two-year, multi-state legal struggle concerning a little boy and the two families who love him. By definition, contested adoption proceedings are traumatic events. There are rarely winners in the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Howard v. Catholic Social Services of Cuyahoga County, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Litsinger Sign Co. v. American Sign Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Daloia v. Franciscan Health System of Central Ohio, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Johnson v. CappsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. In re PalmerOhio Supreme Court · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Moore v. AsenteKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Rosen v. CelebrezzeOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State ex rel. Otten v. HendersonOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. In re Adoption of PushcarOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State ex rel. Allen Cty. Children Servs. Bd. v. Mercer Cty. Common Pleas Court, Probate Div. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API