Legal Opinion

Echols v. Zarn, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 20, 1994No. 9317SC325PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Judge.

The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Defendants contend that the trial court properly granted summary judgment in their favor because plaintiff’s sole remedy for this cause of action is found in the Workers’ Compensation Act. Plaintiff contends, on the other hand, that she may maintain this action against her co-employee, Edith Barnett, pursuant to the holding in Pleasant v. Johnson, 312 N.C. 710, 325 S.E.2d 244 (1985) and against her employer, Zarn, Inc., pursuant to the holding in Woodson v. Rowland, 329…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Woodson v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Pleasant v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Pendergrass v. Card Care, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  4. Strickland v. KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. Dunleavy v. YATES CONST. CO., INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mickles v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  2. Trivette v. YountSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  3. Echols v. Zarn, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  4. Zimmerman Ex Rel. Zimmerman v. Valdak Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Bruno v. Concept Fabrics, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API