Legal Opinion

Chemische Fabrik Von Heyden Aktiengesellschaft v. Tait

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided May 19, 1932No. 4569PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHESNUT, District Judge.

This is a suit at law by the plaintiff to recover ineome tax collected for the year 1919 in the amount of $160,254.17. The defenses are: (a) That the tax (with the exception of the amount of $3,095.90, which has been refunded since the beginning of the suit) was properly due and payable; (b) that the plaintiff’s claim for refund was not filed within four years after the payment of the tax, as is required by Rev. St. 3228 (title 26, USC A § 157); and (e) that if any amount of tax is recoverable, only 78 per cent, is payable to the plaintiff and the remaining 22 per…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Commercial Trust Co. of NJ v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Swiss National Insurance v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Krausz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936
  2. Krausz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936
  3. Von Heyden v. TaitCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API