Chemische Fabrik Von Heyden Aktiengesellschaft v. Tait
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
CHESNUT, District Judge.
This is a suit at law by the plaintiff to recover ineome tax collected for the year 1919 in the amount of $160,254.17. The defenses are: (a) That the tax (with the exception of the amount of $3,095.90, which has been refunded since the beginning of the suit) was properly due and payable; (b) that the plaintiff’s claim for refund was not filed within four years after the payment of the tax, as is required by Rev. St. 3228 (title 26, USC A § 157); and (e) that if any amount of tax is recoverable, only 78 per cent, is payable to the plaintiff and the remaining 22 per…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Commercial Trust Co. of NJ v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Swiss National Insurance v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Krausz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936
- Krausz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936
- Von Heyden v. TaitCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933