Legal Opinion
Montgomery v. East Ridgelawn Cemetery
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 26, 1947PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.
This is a motion by defendant for an order dismissing the complaint on the merits and for summary judgment in favor of defendant. This action is brought by the plaintiff in a dual capacity as individual and as executrix under her deceased husband’s last will and testament. There are three causes of action. All three causes of action seek to recover commissions on the sale of burial privileges in defendant’s cemetery located at Delawanna, New Jersey. The complaint alleges a contract between the parties, which is attached to and made part of the complaint. Neither the plaintiff nor her deceased…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sockel v. Degel Yehudo Cemetery Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- Stout v. William Kennelly, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Cemetery Gardens, Inc. v. BlueweissCity of New York Municipal Court · 1931
- Coufal v. DemertgsisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- Natowitz v. Niagara Falls Memorial Park Cemetery Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
3Cited by6 opinions
- Food Management, Inc. v. Blue Ribbon Beef Pack, Inc., Blue Ribbon Beef Pack, Inc. v. Food Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Solomon v. GoldbergNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- George H. Weinrott & Co. v. BURLINGTON HOUS. CORP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- MAGASINY ONIC DEVICES, INC. v. Precision Specialties, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
- KAZMER-STANDISH, ETC. v. Schoeffel InstrumentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.