Legal Opinion

Sockel v. Degel Yehudo Cemetery Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 28, 1944PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCohn, J.

Appellant, the owner of a cemetery, engaged respondent as a broker to sell burial plots and agreed to pay respondent a specified commission. Respondent, who is not a licensed broker or an employee of appellant, brought about the sale of several lots and has recovered a judgment in the Municipal Court for commissions. From an affirmance of that judgment by the Appellate Term, this appeal is taken.

*208The appeal is limited to one issue of law, namely, whether a real estate broker’s license is required under section 440 et seq. of the Beal Property Law to recover commissions for the sale of cemetery…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fifth Avenue Building Co. v. . KernochanNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Roman v. LobeNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Buffalo City Cemetery v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. Went v. Methodist Protestant ChurchNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Clarke v. KeatingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Erickson v. SUNSET MEMORIAL PARK ASSN., INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  2. Backar v. Western States Producing CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1974
  3. Montgomery v. East Ridgelawn CemeteryNew York Supreme Court · 1947
  4. City of New York v. Washington CemeteryNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Srebnik v. Transportation & Travel Pavilion, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API