Legal Opinion

Perry Estate v. Ford

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1915No. 2703PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Second District; Hon. J. A. Howell, Judge. Action by the D. H. Perry Estate against Rufus Ford. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

The plaintiff, a corporation, in July, 1913, commenced this action against the defendant to restrain him from .trespassing upon a certain strip of ground claimed by it as owner, and, *437in addition to the injunction prayed for, also asked for general relief.

In the complaint plaintiff’s land is described as follows:

“Beginning at the northeast corner of lot No. 9 in block 25, plat A, Ogden City survey; thence south 76 feet; thence west 301.65 feet; thence north 76 feet; thence east to the place of beginning. Together with a strip of land on the north side of said lot bounded and described as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Holmes v. JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Welder v. CarrollTexas Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Pereles v. MagoonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Tanner v. StrattonUtah Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Binford v. EcclesUtah Supreme Court · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Calthorpe v. AbrahamsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  2. Day v. SteeleUtah Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Hummel v. YoungUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Hummel v. YoungUtah Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API