Legal Opinion

Hummel v. Young

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1953No. 7849Published

1Opinion of the Court

1 Utah 2d 237 (1953)

265 P.2d 410

HUMMEL ET AL.

v.

YOUNG ET AL.

No. 7849.

Supreme Court of Utah.

December 24, 1953.

Peter M. Lowe, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellants.

George S. Ballif, Provo, for respondents.

WOLFE, Chief Justice.

This case involves a boundary dispute between the appellants and respondents who are adjoining owners of land abutting the west side of U.S. Highway 91 in Provo, Utah. Appellants' lot lies to the north of respondents' lot and is bounded on the north by Ninth South Street. Respondents' lot is bounded on the north by appellants' lot and on the south by a lot owned by June…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  2. Tripp v. BagleyUtah Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Holmes v. JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Brown v. MillinerUtah Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Home Owners' Loan Corporation v. DudleyUtah Supreme Court · 1943

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API