Legal Opinion

Binford v. Eccles

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1912No. 2346PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Second District; Hon. J. A. Howell, Judge. Action by Sarah E. Binford against David Eceles. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtEkeok, C. J.

This is an action in the nature of ejectment instituted to recover possession of a strip of ground less than two feet in width by 130 feet in length. Upon a trial to the court it made findings of fact which, in our judgment, clearly reflect the allegations of the complaint and the evidence adduced in support thereof, and for thait reason we shall not refer to the pleadings filed by respondent. The only defenses interposed by appellant consisted of a denial of respondent’s ownership and an affirmative statement that appellant owned the strip' of ground in question. The findings of fa.ct are as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Holmes v. JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Rydalch v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Young v. HylandUtah Supreme Court · 1910
  4. West Point Irrigation Co. v. Moroni & Mt. Pleasant Irrigation Ditch Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Tripp v. BagleyUtah Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Brown v. MillinerUtah Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Christensen v. BeutlerUtah Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Houghton v. BartonUtah Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Anderson v. FautinUtah Supreme Court · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API