Legal Opinion
Atkins 333064 v. Washington
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided May 7, 2024No. 2:23-cv-00253Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION ______ FREDERICK NIGEL ATKINS, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:23-cv-253 v. Honorable Maarten Vermaat HEIDI WASHINGTON et al., Defendants. ____________________________/ OPINION This is a civil rights action brought by a state prisoner under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff consented to proceed in all matters in this action under the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge. (ECF…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.