Legal Opinion

State v. Hill

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 10, 1964No. 18274PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bussey, Justice.

The appellant was indicted, convicted and sentenced on a count charging her with possession of unlawful alcoholic liquor, from which conviction and sentence she appeals. The only evidence against the defendant, sufficient to support a conviction, was obtained by virtue of a search warrant, issued solely on the basis of the following affidavit:

“Personally comes J. L. Tabor, who being sworn, says that he is informed by Informer and has good reasons to believe The occupants of 303 Haynie Street has concealed on his or her premises, or in his, her dwelling or in a motor vehicle…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Rugendorf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. State v. MorrisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. YorkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. McRaeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. FunderburkeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968
  4. Seger v. CampSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  5. State v. HarrellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API