State v. York
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Brailsford, Justice.
In January, 1965, the appellant, Hattie York, was convicted in the Court of General Sessions fqr York County of having violated Section 56-1313, Code of 1962, by unlawfully having certain drugs in her possession. The first ground of appeal is that the evidence against her (amphetamine tablets) was the product of an unlawful search of her premises, and should have been excluded. The issue turns upqn the validity of a search warrant issued by a York County magistrate upon the sheriff’s application and affidavit, as follows:
“Personally comes Grover Noe, who being duly sworn…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Rugendorf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State v. HillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. McKnightSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- State v. SachsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
- State v. EllisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
- Swartz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- State v. OwenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.