Legal Opinion

State v. Ciurleo

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 18, 1991No. CX-91-826PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPECIAL TERM OPINION

WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.

This is a pretrial appeal by the state from an order dismissing one count of the complaint. Respondent Christopher Ciur-leo has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as taken from a nonappealable order. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

PACTS

Ciurleo was charged with misdemeanor theft and obstructing legal process with force. Ciurleo moved to dismiss at least one of the counts for lack of probable cause. The state submitted probable cause based on the complaint and the police reports, and Ciurleo presented no testimony.

The trial court dismissed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. State v. DiedrichCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. State Ex Rel. Farrington v. RiggSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  4. Olmscheid v. PatersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. LinvilleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  2. State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  3. State v. DunsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  4. State v. LarkinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  5. State v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API