Legal Opinion
Kim v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 8, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Salvador Collazo, J.), entered on or about August 21, 1996 and May 16, 1997, which denied petitioner’s application to serve a late notice of claim, and, insofar as appealable, denied her motion to renew, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Petitioner’s motion to renew, which proffered the “Aided Report” she filed in connection with the accident, was properly *84denied in the absence of a reasonable excuse for not having submitted the report on the first motion (see, Leonard Fuchs, Inc. v Laser Processing Corp., 222 AD2d 280). In any event, we would affirm…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chattergoon v. New York City Housing AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Chattergoon v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Seif v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Leonard Fuchs, Inc. v. Laser Processing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Rodriguez v. New York City Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Acevedo v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2002
- Matter of Corwin v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Matter of Corwin v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Solomon v. RYTY Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003