Legal Opinion · Dissent

Matter of Corwin v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 28, 2016No. 150668/15 1247 1246Published

1Dissent

Andrias and Richter JJ.,

dissent in part in a memorandum by Andrias, J., as follows: I agree with the majority that the motion court properly denied petitioners’ motion for leave to amend their notice of claim under General Municipal Law § 50-e (6). I also agree with the majority that petitioners should have been granted leave to file a late notice of claim pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (6) to assert a claim based on the City’s alleged negligence and professional negligence in the design of the infrastructure of the Citi Bike program and the incident site (the design claim).…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pierson v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Chattergoon v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Whittaker v. New York City Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Harris v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Scott v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API