Legal Opinion
Chattergoon v. New York City Housing Authority
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 1, 1991PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question not answered as unnecessary. The Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion as a matter of law in denying petitioner leave to serve a late notice of claim (General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
2Cited by54 opinions
- Ragland v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. TownsleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Seif v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Plantin v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Weber v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.