Legal Opinion
Peter Garrett Gunsmith, Inc. v. City of Dayton
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided July 26, 2002No. 2001-CA-001311-MRPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUCKINGHAM, Judge.
Peter Garrett Gunsmith, Inc., appeals from a judgment of the Campbell Circuit Court in favor of the City of Dayton, Kentucky, and the City of Bellevue, Kentucky. The circuit court found that KRS 1 65.870 did not prohibit zoning ordinances in each city from restricting the locations in which a gun shop could operate. We conclude that the circuit court correctly awarded judgment in favor of the cities, and thus we affirm.
Peter Garrett is a gunsmith and a licensed firearms dealer. He is the owner and operator of Peter Garrett Gunsmith, Inc., a business located in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bob Hook Chevrolet Isuzu, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Transportation CabinetKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
- Beckham v. Bd. of Educ. of Jefferson Cty.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1994
- Layne v. NewbergKentucky Supreme Court · 1992
- Combs v. Hubb Coal Corp.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1996
- Hale v. CombsKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Riverdale Development Co. v. Ruffin Building Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Sheffield v. City of Fort Thomas, Ky.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Neill v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Farm Credit Midsouth, PCA v. Reece Contracting, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Commonwealth v. HollowayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.