Legal Opinion
Sheffield v. City of Fort Thomas, Ky.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 3, 2010No. 09-5619PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOGGS, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff William Sheffield challenges several municipal ordinances enacted by the city of Fort Thomas, Kentucky, alleging that the ordinances violate the United States and Kentucky Constitutions and that the ordinances are preempted by Kentucky state statutes and administrative regulations. The district court rejected all of Sheffield’s challenges. With one exception, we agree with that conclusion. We hold, however, that the district court erred in concluding that Kentucky administrative regulations have no preemptive force as against Kentucky municipal…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Puckett v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Pahssen Ex Rel. Doe v. Merrill Community School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- American Express Travel Related Services Co. v. KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- David Shoemaker v. City of HowellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.