Legal Opinion

Neill v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 18, 2003No. 03-214PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jim Hannah, Justice.

Lamar Neill appeals a summary judgment entered in favor of Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company finding a policy was void ab initio because the insurance application signed by Neill and prepared by an agent of Nationwide indicated Neill had no prior history of fire losses when he did. Neill asserts that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because genuine issues of material fact remain regarding whether Neill or Nationwide is responsible for the mistakes about prior fire history on the application. Nationwide argues that Neill is bound by the application…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Adams v. ArthurSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. FooteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Cole v. LawsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Carmichael v. Nationwide Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  5. Mitchell Manufacturing Co. v. KempnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Harris v. City of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance v. CalvinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  3. PHL Variable Insurance v. Fulbright McNeill, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  4. Vogelgesang v. U.S. Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
  5. Cincinnati Life Insurance v. MicklesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API