Legal Opinion

United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 2, 1904No. 16PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated- in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fuller

delivered the opinion of the court.'

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus, commanding the judge of the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio to direct the entry on the records of that court of final judgment in the cases of The United States v. Jock Coe, Bong Meng, and Woo Joe, and that the clerk enter the same; and that the .cases be-treated as properly appealed from the United States commissioner before whom they, had been heard in the first instance and as having been before the District Court for determination. The complaint against Coe was made before…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chin Bak Kan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. United States v. Mrs. Gue LimSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Tom Hong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Ah How v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Porter Ads. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1877

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Opinion Number, Louisiana Attorney General Reports1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API