Tom Hong v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEALS PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. These cases were considered together and are appeals from an order entered in the District Court of the United.
Read the full summary
APPEALS PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. These cases were considered together and are appeals from an order entered in the District Court of the United. States for the Eastern District of New York, affirming an order made by a United States commissioner, directing the deportation of the appellants from the United States to China.upon the ground that they were found witliin this country without certificates of registration, as required by the act of May 5, 1892, as amended November 3, 1893. T Comp. Stat. 1901, 1322. The complaint charges that…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day
The- contention of the appellants that their right to remain in the United States is enlarged by the ..treaty with China of December, 1894, considered with § 1 of the act of April 29, 1902, c. 641, 32 Stat. 176, continuing all laws then in force so far as the same are not inconsistent with treaty obligations in its effect upon the acts of 1892, as amended in 1893, is disposed of by the case of Ah How v. United States, decided at this term, ante p. 65.
For the first time in the history of legislation, having for its purpose the exclusion of certain Chinese from the country, or their deportation…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Chin Bak Kan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
3Cited by35 opinions
- Liu Hop Fong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. v. R.R. Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Bak Kun v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
- United States v. Lee CheeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.