Legal Opinion

In Re Smith Barney, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1998No. 97-0423PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHecht, Justice

in which PHILLIPS, Chief Justice, GONZALEZ, OWEN and ABBOTT, Justices joined.

The issue in this mandamus proceeding is whether the district court abused its discretion by denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the underlying litigation on the basis of forum non conveniens. We deny relief.

I

Relator Smith Barney, Inc., a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in New York, has been sued by five plaintiffs: The Privatization Group, Inc., a Texas corporation doing business only in New York (“TPGI-TX”); George Borey, a citizen of Poland residing in New York City; Pawel Jagiello, a…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
  3. Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. G. A. Stowers Furniture Co. v. American Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Lunsford v. MorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1988

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. In Re Pirelli Tire, L.L.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Owens Corning v. CarterTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Quixtar Inc. v. Signature Management Team, LLCTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Vickery v. VickeryTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. in Re State Farm LloydsTexas Supreme Court · 2017

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API