Legal Opinion

Fort Smith Light & Traction Co. v. Bourland

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 18, 1923PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, C. J.

Appellant is a corporation owning and operating a street-car system in the city of Fort Smith, and this case involves the right of appellant to remove and abandon a portion of its track along one of the streets of the city, contrary to the orders of the city commissioners, the city of Fort Smith.being operated under a commission form of government.

Appellant formerly operated under a franchise granted by the city government many years ago, but, during the existence of the ‘Corporation Commission, under the act of April 1, 1919 (Crawford & Moses’ Digest, § 1607 et seq.), it surrendered its’…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. North Carolina Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Kansas Ex Rel. Railroad CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. New York Ex Rel. New York & Queens Gas Co. v. McCallSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Wheat v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
  5. Parkison v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1905

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Levy v. AlbrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  2. Fort Smith Light & Traction Co. v. BourlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. State Ex Rel. Daniel v. Broad River Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  4. Fisher v. BranscumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  5. American Party v. BrandonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API