Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Branscum

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 20, 1967No. 5-4328PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John A. Fogleman, Justice.

Appellants ask that we reverse the trial court’s affirmance of an order of the Arkansas Commerce Commission authorizng the transfer of a certificate of public convenience and necessity. This certificate for the transportation of household goods was issued to one Homer Fisher on March 16, 1955. It covered irregular routes between points in Arkansas, but all shipments were required to originate or terminate in Mississippi County. Fisher entered into a contract with Branscum for the sale of these operating rights. The joint application of these parties was resisted by…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Missouri Pac. Railroad Co., Thompson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  2. Fort Smith Light & Traction Co. v. BourlandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  3. Wisinger v. StewartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  4. Arkansas Express, Inc. v. Columbia Motor Transport Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  5. Piggott State Bank v. State Banking BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Arkansas Contractors Licensing Board v. Butler Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Bridges v. Arkansas Motor Coaches, Ltd., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  4. In Re Gray Line Hawai'i, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  5. City of Fort Smith v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API