Legal Opinion
Monroe v. Horwitch
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 26, 1990No. 13831PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGlass, J.
The plaintiff, Nadine 0. Monroe, commenced this action in the Superior Court for the judicial district of New London by filing a “Complaint/Presentment” against the defendant, Daniel B. Horwitch, who is the statewide bar counsel.1 In the presentment por*470tion of the plaintiffs action, she sought to present the defendant to the court for discipline. In her complaint, the plaintiff alleged that the defendant had denied grievance complainants “due process and equal protection of the law” by failing to enforce time limits for the processing of grievance complaints. In addition, she alleged that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Maloney v. PacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Hayes v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Caulkins v. PetrilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Housing Authority v. Local 1161Connecticut Appellate Court · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ganim v. Smith & Wesson Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Gay & Lesbian Law Students Ass'n v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- RMS Residential Properties, LLC v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Blakeney v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.