Legal Opinion
People v. Rossman
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided February 9, 2006No. 04CA0425PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRothenberg, J.
Defendant, Conrad Clayton Rossman, appeals the trial court order denying his motion (1)to modify a condition of his probation requiring him to submit to the collection of a biological sample for DNA testing; and (2) to declare § 16-11-204.3, C.R.S.2005, unconstitutional as applied to him and other persons on probation. Because we conclude the trial court did not err in requiring defendant to submit a sample for DNA testing, we affirm.
Defendant was charged with second degree burglary and forgery. He pled guilty to both offenses and was sentenced to three years probation and 180 days of…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ferguson v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. JenkinsColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- . People v. TrujilloColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
- People v. Hernandez-ClavelColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- People v. ParksColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- People v. ValdezColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.