Legal Opinion

Purkey v. American Home Assurance Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 2005No. M2005-00044-SC-R23-CQPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

E. RILEY ANDERSON, J.,

delivered

the opinion of the court,

in which FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, C.J., and ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., JANICE M. HOLDER, and WILLIAM M. BARKER, JJ., joined.

We accepted three questions certified to this Court from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee concerning whether provisions in automobile insurance Lability policies that exclude coverage for bodily injury to household or family members of the insured are void as against Tennessee law or public policy. We conclude that such provisions are valid.

Pursuant to Rule 28 of the Tennessee…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. WiscombWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Alcazar v. HayesTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  3. American Justice Insurance Reciprocal v. HutchisonTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Estep v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Davis v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Starr v. HillTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Edward Martin v. Gregory PowersTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Armstrong v. United States Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2009
  4. Patterson v. Convention Center Authority of the Metropolitan GovernmentCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2013
  5. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Diana Lynn TARRANT Et Al.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API