Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. City of Snohomish

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1894No. 1046PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Snohomish Coimty.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Anders, J.

— It is provided, among other things, in § 10, art. 11 of the state constitution, that—

‘£ Corporations for municipal purposes shall not be created by special laws; but the legislature, by general laws, shall provide for the incorporation, organization and classification, in proportion to population, of cities and towns, which laws may be altered, amended or repealed. Cities and towns heretofore organized or incorporated may become organized under such general laws whenever a majority of the electors voting at a general election shall so…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kelly v. PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Morford v. UngerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
  3. Ewing v. State Ex Rel. PollardTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. State v. Washington Social Library Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1841
  5. Territory of Washington ex rel. Kelly v. StewartWashington Supreme Court · 1890

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State ex inf. Major v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  2. Port of Tacoma v. ParosaWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Copeland v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  4. Causten v. BarnetteWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Frace v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API