Gimarc v. Neal

ORDER OF JUDGMENT

HEMPHILL, District Judge.

This is an action brought to recover damages for alleged violation of subchapter 4 of the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act (Public Law 92-513). 1 Plaintiff claimed (and proved) that the automobile she purchased from the defendant Carl Neal had an odometer upon which the mileage registered approximately 44,000 miles but that the actual mileage was in excess of 74,000 miles. Plaintiff had initially sued the various owners, but at the end of the testimony, 2 the court granted the motion of the plaintiff for judgment against Carl Neal, from…