Legal Opinion

Mills v. Todd

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1882No. 8466PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Ripley Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bicknell, C. C.

The appellees brought this suit against, the appellants, to foreclose a mortgage, claiming that the writing sued on," although in form an absolute deed from the appellants to the appellees, was intended to secure $1,400, the purchase-money of certain land, and $400 for another debt.

The land had formerly belonged to Robert Mills, deceased,, who was the husband of the appellant Mary Mills, Sr., and the father of the appellants Joseph Mills and William Mills; it had been sold_to one Wheeler, upon a judgment against *26Robert Milbj and the appellants were seeking to repurchase it for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mendenhall v. LenwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1839
  2. Berry v. BatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1828
  3. Irons v. WoodfillIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Newkirk v. NeildIndiana Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Adams v. First Nat. Bank of WacoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Barton v. Farmers' State BankTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  3. Vogel v. HarrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Fisher v. StevensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  5. Durbin v. Northwestern Scraper Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API