Newkirk v. Neild
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Floyd Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.
Action by Heild against the appellants, upon a promissory note.
The defendants filed an answer of four paragraphs, to three of which a demurrer was sustained. Issue on the other paragraph; trial; finding and judgment for the plaintiff.
*195The case comes before us on the ruling of the Court sustaining the demurrer to the three paragraphs of the answer. These paragraphs need not be here copied, as the questions presented by them are properly stated in the following excerpt from the brief of counsel for the appellants. “The questions intended to be raised by these pleadings are: Whether, after a note…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mendenhall v. LenwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1839
- Tate v. BooeIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
- Clark v. SnellingIndiana Supreme Court · 1849
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kerfoot v. KessenerIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
- Williams v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Nelson v. WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Durbin v. Northwestern Scraper Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1905
- Mills v. ToddIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.