People v. Stoll
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.
The appellant was accused by information of the crime of rape and incest. During the trial, on motion of the district attorney, the charge of rape was dismissed. The defendant was found guilty of the crime of incest. This appeal is taken from the judgment and the order denying his motion for a new trial.
The only points argued by the appellant in his brief are that the court erred in refusing to give an instruction to the jury that the complaining witness was an accomplice, and that it was error to admit evidence showing her pregnancy.
It appears that the prosecutrix is the daughter of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Porath v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. TarboxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Beaudette v. GagneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1895
- People v. SotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. TobiasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. FeatherstoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- People v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- People v. LachukCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- People v. PettisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.