Cummins v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MICHAEL CUMMINS, et al., : CIVIL NO. 1:22-CV-01205 : Plaintiffs, : (Magistrate Judge Schwab) : v. : : WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P., : individually and d/b/a WAL-MART : SUPERCENTER, et al., : : Defendants. : MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction. The plaintiffs, Michael and Tamera Cummins, bring claims for negligence and loss of consortium against a number of corporate defendants that own and operate a Walmart where Michael slipped and fell. Currently pending is the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Marie Saldana v. Kmart Corporation Marie Saldana, in No. 99-4055Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.