Legal Opinion

Cummins v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 24, 2024No. 1:22-cv-01205Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MICHAEL CUMMINS, et al., : CIVIL NO. 1:22-CV-01205 : Plaintiffs, : (Magistrate Judge Schwab) : v. : : WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P., : individually and d/b/a WAL-MART : SUPERCENTER, et al., : : Defendants. : MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction. The plaintiffs, Michael and Tamera Cummins, bring claims for negligence and loss of consortium against a number of corporate defendants that own and operate a Walmart where Michael slipped and fell. Currently pending is the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Marie Saldana v. Kmart Corporation Marie Saldana, in No. 99-4055Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API