Moore v. Wayman
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Bridgewater, A.C.J.
Pierce County appeals a judgment that held it responsible for negligent inspection of a residence based upon a special relationship with the builders. We hold that building code compliance inspections are a governmental, not proprietary, function. We also hold that the public duty doctrine remains constitutional because the Supreme Court has not abolished it. We hold that with no express assurance that the residence was in compliance with building codes, there is not sufficient evidence to support the jury’s finding of a special relationship as an exception to the public…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Taylor v. Stevens CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Chambers-Castanes v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Halvorson v. DahlWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Hoffer v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Prosser v. Kennedy Enterprises, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
- Borden v. City of OlympiaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Borden v. City of OlympiaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- West Coast, Inc. v. Snohomish CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Kaech v. Lewis County PUDCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.