Legal Opinion

Glenn County v. Johnston

California Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1900No. Sac. No. 623PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Glenn County and from orders denying a new trial and denying a motion of the defendants to vacate and annul proceedings for condemnation. Frank Moody, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion. Seth Millington, and Charles L. Donohoe, for Appellants.

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNES, C.

In July, 1893, proceedings were taken by the board of supervisors of Glenn county to lay out and establish a public road, in part over lands of the defendants, and the viewers awarded to the defendants, as nonconsenting landowners, damages in the sum of one thousand and ten dollars, and an order was made setting aside that sum out of the funds of the proper road district. At the time there was not sufficient money m said fund to pay the same. Afterward, in December, 1893, another order was made setting apart funds for that purpose, but it was not called for or accepted by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. California Southern Railroad v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Butte County v. BoydstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. County of Sonoma v. CrozierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Johnston v. Board of Supervisors of Glenn CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. San Diego Land & Town Co. v. NealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mendocino County v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  2. Big Lost River Irrigation Co. v. DavidsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Colusa v. Superior Court of County of GlennCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  4. City of Los Angeles v. DeaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. County of Madera v. Raymond Granite Co.California Supreme Court · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API