In Re Experience Modification Automobile Liability Insurance, Blue Bird Taxi Company of Asheville, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtEnviN, J.
Counsel for the appellees argue that the experience rating plan is just in that it imposes on each included taxicab owner as far as practicable his fair share of the cost of liability insurance. They assert also that the experience rating plan is wise in that it affords a twofold encouragement to safety on the highways by offering reduced premiums to included taxicab owners who are better than average risks and by exacting increased premiums from included taxicab owners who aré worse than average risks. They insist, moreover, that the differences in the premium charges for liability insurance…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Botany Worsted Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Raleigh & Gaston Railroad v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Smith v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Howell v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- In Re Sale of Land of SharpeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. North Carolina Reinsurance FacilitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. HensleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Phillips v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.