Legal Opinion

Pedrow v. Federoff

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 18, 1926No. Docket No. 2960PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

This is an action for personal injuries alleged to have been received by the plaintiff Lydia Pedrow through and by the negligence of the defendants. The complaint alleges the facts in detail, and prays for damages—damage to Lydia Pedrow, damage to Thomas J. Pedrow, and for doctor’s bill and medicine, each separately stated—in the total sum of $1,750. The answer specifically denies the allegations of the complaint and sets up as a special defense contributory negligence.

The cause was tried by the court without a jury and plaintiffs were awarded judgment in the sum of $369.

The defendants appeal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brandt v. KroghCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  2. Robinson v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Chester v. BowerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Rice v. California Lutheran HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Bechtold v. Bishop & Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1940
  3. People v. HolmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Winning v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Davis v. RentonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API